cropped-short_post_logo.png
For Authentic Gossip
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
election comission

Elections Cost Candidates Far Higher Than Raised Prescribed Limits, Though Political Parties Face No Spending Caps

Prior to crucial assembly polls in five states, the Election Commission of India raised the ceiling on poll-related expenditure by candidates from the existing Rs 20 lakh to Rs 28 lakh and, from Rs 28 lakh to Rs 40 lakh in states and Union territories. “These hikes in expense limits by the EC are a farce…they spend far beyond the (prescribed) statutory limit. Former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee himself said this,” points out Prof Jagdeep Chokkar of Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR). Quoting a study of election expenditure affidavits of 5,743 candidates of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections that ADR did, Chokkar recalls that only 4 candidates had declared expenditure above the then permitted limit of Rs 25 lakh; 30 candidates had spent between 95%-100 % of their limit. The remaining (5,743-4-30= 5,719) or 99.58% said they had spent between 45%-55% of the limit. Four years later a senior (late) Maharashtra BJP leader publicly stated that between Rs 8-10 crore was the actual cost of fighting each Lok Sabha seat in 2009 when the prescribed limit was Rs 25 lakhs. The same leader had declared in his sworn affidavit that his actual expenditure was Rs 19.63 lakh. Limiting individual expenditure of candidates by itself, serves little purpose. “The elephant in the room is — there is no cap on expenditure that political parties can incur”.

TRENDS & VIEWS

Editor’s Note: Big Punch In Small Pack

It is the Third Anniversary of Short Post and as a news media startup launched during the Covid-19 pandemic it certainly feels better than good to find ourselves where we are today. Here, I must cite the unstinted support of our seasoned contributors, all senior editors in the country, who brought a great degree of maturity and sagacity to the Short Post newsroom. But for them, our tagline “Authentic Gossip”, an Oxymoron, would not have matured viably. Our user numbers may be small but our stories have created the desired impact among people who matter — decision makers and influencers. We offer a big punch in a small pack and Short Post with its 225-word stories has been punching above its weight category. Having posted close to 3,000 stories in the last 36 months, Short Post, I feel, is an idea whose time has come.
And this is vindicated by our two marquee advertisers – IDFC FIRST Bank and ICICI Lombard. Both believed in our story and have supported us from Day one. A big thank you to both.
If you look at the media landscape – print, TV and digital — it is a mixed bag. There are job losses as some outfits have closed down while a lucky few were bailed out by large corporate houses. Yes, there is a lot of action in the digital space. However, the entry of corporate houses has raised the question of independence of news media outfits. Sadly, there are just a handful of independent media outfits in the country that are highly respected for their neutrality. At Short Post, our credo is not to take sides, prejudge issues or be biased but, informing readers of behind-the-scenes happenings. In essence, Short Post strives to be a neutral editorial platform — neither anti-establishment nor pro-establishment.
As I said last year, disruptions in the media world are moving at a fast and furious pace. Technology is playing a very big role in how content is generated and consumed. But, we are neither alarmed nor perturbed as it is all a part of the evolution process. What gives us comfort is that AI is unable to create original gossipy content. And that is the news arena where we have achieved a distinction.