But For Nehru, Nepal Could Have Been Part Of India

A little-known historical episode concerning the relations between India and Nepal has gone viral on the social media over the past few days. As the symbiotic bonds between the two countries are recalled by many people from both sides of the border, the role of Indian leaders concerning Nepal is under scanner once again. One such topic is the merger of Nepal with India that did not happen. It speculates how this probable relationship could have changed the political map of South Asia. Then PM Jawaharlal Nehru has been blamed for stalling this possible merger. It is said that Nepal’s then King Tribhuvan Bir Bikram Shah proposed that merger. However, Nehru rejected the idea, according to references in former President Pranab Mukherjee’s memoir, ‘The Presidential Years.’ Mukherjee observed that had Indira Gandhi been in her father’s place, she would have accepted, just the way she later integrated Sikkim into India. Former Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar also has backed Mukherjee’s claim. In his Hindi autobiography, moreover, he has stated that Nepal could have been a part of India but for Nehru. In ‘Jeevan Jaisa Jiya,’ Chandrashekhar has described how Nepalese leader BP Koirala was disturbed when then Deputy PM Charan Singh broached the subject of merger at their meeting in presence of PM Morarji Desai. Earlier this year, Nepal’s Deputy PM Prakashman Singh lauded Chandra Shekhar’s role in consolidating the Nepal-India relations at an interaction organized by the Ganeshman Singh Foundation on 7 April. Interestingly, Nehru was criticised in the past for rejecting a similar offer from Baluchistan, whose leaders wanted to join India.